Evidence explorer

Which public bottles match this evidence brief, and what still needs verification?

Live catalog tdsi-988807bc30ee

Reset to wine

Current answer

2 public records

Scope: Wine · France · Method missing · Claim needs stronger evidence

2 public records match. Documented named removal method: 0 of 2 eligible records. Documented exact residual claim: 0 of 2 records. Firsthand scores: 1.

Evidence gaps stay in the denominator. Method missing or withheld: 2; method conflicts: 0; ABV missing or unsupported: 2; ABV conflicts: 0; documented grapes: 0 of 2 wine records.

Pass the evidence on

Share this exact research brief

The copied counts are dated. Its permalink is labeled as a live view because catalog evidence can change after it is sent.

Open permalink
Preview plain-text brief

Supporting bottles

2 bottles

Page 1 of 1 · Each claim opens its source trail.

Jackson-Triggs

Jackson-Triggs Rosé

Public product ID TDS-0569

Awaiting tasting · no public score
Origin
France
Style
Rosé
Classification
Dealcoholized
Availability
United States: Upside Drinks (add-to-cart observed 10 Nov 2026). Canada: Jackson-Triggs / Arterra press release (6 Jan 2026) says 0% wines… checked 10 Nov 2026
Removal method Undeclared Method missing
Evidence
No field-level source
Supports
No public supporting sentence is stored for this field.
Residual ABV 0.0% Claim needs stronger evidence
Evidence
Retailer sourced
Checked
2026-11-10
Supports
The source is associated with this field; no public supporting sentence is stored.
Grape varieties Not documented Grapes not documented
Evidence
No field-level source
Supports
No public supporting sentence is stored for this field.

Ollivier Cottenceau

Ollivier Cottenceau Phénomène

Public product ID TDS-0060

84/100
Origin
France
Style
Melon de Bourgogne
Classification
Dealcoholized
Availability
Producer shop checked 7 Nov 2026
Removal method Undeclared Method missing
Evidence
Distributor sourced
Checked
2026-10-07
Supports
The source is associated with this field; no public supporting sentence is stored.
Residual ABV <0.5% Claim needs stronger evidence
Evidence
Retailer sourced
Checked
2026-09-22
Supports
The source is associated with this field; no public supporting sentence is stored.
Grape varieties Not documented Grapes not documented
Evidence
No field-level source
Supports
No public supporting sentence is stored for this field.

Global overview

Catalog coverage, with the gaps left visible

635 publicly inspectable records. 21 work-in-progress records are excluded. Catalog composition is coverage—not market size, share, sales, demand, or launches.

Recorded catalog growth

Catalog coverage and firsthand tasted-and-scored coverage are separate series. A catalog addition is a TDS coverage event—not a market launch.

Launch milestone 2026-09-18 First recorded bottle; not a full inventory snapshot.

No earlier comparable inventory snapshots are on record. The chart starts with today’s live snapshot; the missing interval is intentional.

View snapshot table and sources
DatePublic catalogTasted & scoredScopeSource
2026-11-13 635 365 public_catalog_v1 Live catalog · tdsi-988807bc30ee

Field-by-field completeness

Evidence states—not a disclosure leaderboard

Completeness is not quality, safety, honesty, or proof that one process makes a better drink. These explicit rules are groundwork for a future Transparency Index, not an index itself.

Removal method

0/2 removal-eligible records have a documented named method. Inapplicable and unknown applicability remain outside that denominator.

Residual ABV

0/2 records have a sourced exact residual claim without an open ABV conflict. Label-only declarations and ceilings stay separate.

Lab-tested residual share is not yet measurable from current records; a declaration is not called a lab result without lab evidence.

Grape varieties

0/2 wine records have a supported grape field. Presence in this catalog does not measure grape demand or tell growers what to plant.