The cellar
Compare bottles
Find the differences that matter to your glass. Compare flavor, structure, alcohol, and how each bottle was made.
The short version
Where they differ
Declared alcohol
- Bottle 1<0.49%
- Bottle 2<0.5%
Production
- Bottle 1Hybrid
- Bottle 2Dealcoholized
Flavor profile
- Bottle 1Orange, Orange peel, Apple
- Bottle 2Apple, White peach, Floral, Orchard fruit, Citrus, Mineral
Structure, side by side
From our tastings. Each mark shows an assessed level, with the same scale for every bottle.
Sweetness
1NozecoSweet
2SelbachNot assessed
Body
1NozecoLight body
2SelbachLight body
Acidity
1NozecoNot assessed
2SelbachBright acidity
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Taste | ||
| Score Differs | 78/100 |
83/100 |
| Verdict | Sweet orange and lively bubbles make this recognizably mimosa-like, but the processed fruit character limits its appeal. | Fragrant apple and white peach, rounded citrus and orchard fruit, and a gentle sparkle. Noticeable sweetness is lifted by lively acidity, with citrus and lig… |
| Flavor Differs | Orange, Orange peel, Apple | Apple, White peach, Floral, Orchard fruit, Citrus, Mineral |
| Sweetness Differs | Sweet | — |
| Acidity Differs | — | Bright acidity |
| Likeness | The sweet orange and light sparkling-wine base make the mimosa resemblance clear. | — |
| Alcohol & production | ||
| Alcohol level Differs | <0.49% | <0.5% |
| Production Differs | Hybrid | Dealcoholized |
| Method Differs | Undeclared | Membrane / cold filtration |
| Product facts | ||
| Origin | Bordeaux, France | Mosel, Germany |
| Evidence | ||
| Sources | 6 sources | 5 sources |
| Last verified | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-18 |