The cellar
Compare bottles
Find the differences that matter to your glass. Compare flavor, structure, alcohol, and how each bottle was made.
The short version
Where they differ
Sweetness
- Bottle 1Sweet
- Bottle 2Dry
Declared alcohol
- Bottle 1<0.49%
- Bottle 2<0.5%
Production
- Bottle 1Hybrid
- Bottle 2Dealcoholized
Structure, side by side
From our tastings. Each mark shows an assessed level, with the same scale for every bottle.
Sweetness
1NozecoSweet
2RondelDry
Body
1NozecoLight body
2RondelLight body
Acidity
1NozecoNot assessed
2RondelBright acidity
Look closer
The full comparison
Hiding 6 matching fields. Show every field
Blank and undeclared values are missing evidence. They are not treated as the same.
| Field |
1 Nozeco |
|
|---|---|---|
| Taste | ||
| Score Differs | 78/100 |
79/100 |
| Verdict | Sweet orange and lively bubbles make this recognizably mimosa-like, but the processed fruit character limits its appeal. | Dealcoholized Spanish sparkling cava under 0.5% ABV. Green apple and citrus, fine bubbles, bright acid. Solid everyday value. |
| Flavor Differs | Orange, Orange peel, Apple | Green apple, Lemon, Citrus |
| Sweetness Differs | Sweet | Dry |
| Acidity Differs | — | Bright acidity |
| Likeness | The sweet orange and light sparkling-wine base make the mimosa resemblance clear. | Reads as a simple cava more than as sparkling apple juice. The bead is the argument. |
| Alcohol & production | ||
| Alcohol level Differs | <0.49% | <0.5% |
| Production Differs | Hybrid | Dealcoholized |
| Product facts | ||
| Origin | Bordeaux, France | Penedès, Spain |
| Evidence | ||
| Verification Differs | Bottle verified | Producer documented |
| Sources | 6 sources | 5 sources |
| Last verified | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-03 |