The cellar
Compare bottles
Find the differences that matter to your glass. Compare flavor, structure, alcohol, and how each bottle was made.
1 Thomson & Scott
Noughty Sparkling Rosé
Research record
Remove Thomson & Scott Noughty Sparkling Rosé
The short version
Where they differ
No clear differences in the assessed structure or declared production facts. Check the tasting notes and evidence below for a fuller picture.
Structure, side by side
From our tastings. Each mark shows an assessed level, with the same scale for every bottle.
Sweetness
1Thomson & ScottNot yet tasted
2OddbirdOff-dry
Body
1Thomson & ScottNot yet tasted
2OddbirdLight body
Acidity
1Thomson & ScottNot yet tasted
2OddbirdModerate acidity
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Taste | ||
| Record Differs | Research record | Tasted |
| Score Differs | Research record | 85/100 |
| Verdict | Research record | Raspberry, rose petal, and cherry on the nose; ripe red berries and tart cherry on a semi-dry, berry-led sparkling pour that stays clean. |
| Flavor Differs | Research record | Raspberry, Rose, Cherry, Citrus, Red berry |
| Sweetness Differs | Research record | Off-dry |
| Body Differs | Research record | Light body |
| Acidity Differs | Research record | Moderate acidity |
| Likeness | Research record | Good: recognizably sparkling rosé; fruit-forward more than taut or mineral. |
| Product facts | ||
| Origin | La Mancha, Spain | Languedoc-Roussillon, France |
| Evidence | ||
| Last verified | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |