The cellar
Compare bottles
Find the differences that matter to your glass. Compare flavor, structure, alcohol, and how each bottle was made.
The short version
Where they differ
Sweetness
- Bottle 1Sweet
- Bottle 2Dry
Declared alcohol
- Bottle 1<0.49%
- Bottle 2<0.3%
Production
- Bottle 1Hybrid
- Bottle 2Dealcoholized
Structure, side by side
From our tastings. Each mark shows an assessed level, with the same scale for every bottle.
Sweetness
1NozecoSweet
2UNDONEDry
Body
1NozecoLight body
2UNDONELight body
Acidity
1NozecoNot assessed
2UNDONEBright acidity
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Taste | ||
| Score Differs | 78/100 |
79/100 |
| Verdict | Sweet orange and lively bubbles make this recognizably mimosa-like, but the processed fruit character limits its appeal. | Dealcoholized sparkling white under 0.3% ABV. Apple, citrus zest, and light florals on the nose; crisp, lightly fruity, fine bubbles; clean citrusy apple-led… |
| Flavor Differs | Orange, Orange peel, Apple | Apple, Citrus, Floral |
| Sweetness Differs | Sweet | Dry |
| Acidity Differs | — | Bright acidity |
| Likeness | The sweet orange and light sparkling-wine base make the mimosa resemblance clear. | Reads as sparkling white rather than grape soda — fruit, acid, and fine bubbles in balance. |
| Alcohol & production | ||
| Alcohol level Differs | <0.49% | <0.3% |
| Production Differs | Hybrid | Dealcoholized |
| Method Differs | Undeclared | Other documented method |
| Product facts | ||
| Origin | Bordeaux, France | Hamburg, Germany |
| Evidence | ||
| Verification Differs | Bottle verified | Producer documented |
| Sources | 6 sources | 4 sources |
| Last verified | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-04 |